Part-Time Pundit

ACLU Earns Money on the Backs of Immigrants

The ACLU is upset that New Jersey schools are asking students for Social Security Numbers when they enroll for school. As usual they are upset for the wrong reasons and deceiving the public in the process.

First, the ACLU is at the forefront of litigation and lobbying to prevent the United States from having a national identification card (the kind of thing the 9/11 Commission suggested we do to prevent terrorism). The problem is that we already have a national identification; we call it a Social Security Number. If someone steals that number, they own your identity, it’s just that simple.

Instead of adopting some form of strong identification for citizens, we are stuck with the easy to steal SSNs which have greatly contributed to over $24 billion in compromised assets belonging to US citizens that is available to be stolen at any moment by malicious hackers.

With SSNs being so valuable, schools have no business having them. They simply shouldn’t be spending their money on data protection when our schools are rivaling the third world for the gutter. If we are going to continue to waste money on public schools, at least they should try to spend it on students.

However, the key point of contention of the ACLU isn’t privacy; it is that immigrants will be scared off from sending their students to public schools “both documented and undocumented.” The problem is that all documented students can get Social Security Numbers. If you are in this country legally, you have no problem with the Social Security Administration. They are simply throwing that up there to make the policy sound xenophobic.

The only people who would potentially have problems with this policy is illegal immigrants, or more specifically, the illegal immigrants who don’t bother to steal an SSN for their kid. The sticky part here is that despite both the government of Mexico and the government of the United States refusing to actually enforce their own laws, there is still a group of people who don’t strictly speaking have a legal right to be here.

No politician has suggested we just dissolve the border, or for that matter, abolish immigration law, but they continue to act as if the law doesn’t exist. Amazingly enough, failure to enforce the law has lead to lawlessness and confusion. This case wouldn’t exist if it weren’t for the US government deciding certain laws aren’t really laws without bothering with what some of us like to call “the democratic process”.

The ACLU, for its part, is at least open that it believes the United States really isn’t a nation but just a spot on the map where everyone who can manage the trip is entitled the full privileges of citizenship. Despite everything to the contrary in the Constitution and US Code, the ACLU believes every foreign citizen has the full rights to be in this country, regardless of what the law says.

If the ACLU was truly intellectually honest, however, they’d be suing to have the entire body of immigration law thrown out. That seems to be what they really want, no regulations on immigration whatsoever. It’s a rather startling departure from a pro-regulation group.

Instead, they keep the laws on the books and the dyslexic approach to immigration this nation takes so they can continue to file lawsuits. Immigration lawsuits have become an income stream and the ACLU doesn’t want to see that go away because the problem was “solved”. Much of the lawyer industry has adopting tactics that ensure litigation and maximum possible lawyering, why should the ACLU be any different? After all, they are the beneficiaries while the common man picks up the tab.

The biggest deception of the ACLU is thus leveled right on the shoulders of the undocumented workers they claim to support. They don’t try to solve their problems; they simply try to prolong them so they can keep racking up legal fees. Protectors of the Bill of Rights?  Hardly.

August 30th, 2006 Posted by John Bambenek | Law / Legal Issues, Politics, StoptheACLU | no comments

Democracy will Fail in Lebanon

(The following is an adaptation of part of a radio show I co-hosted with Kit Jarrel of Euphoric Reality, the podcast should be available below.)

While the provocation of hostilities falls squarely on the shoulders of Hezbollah (and in the case of Gaza, Hamas), Israel misprosecuted the war. That was bad enough. Worse is the “diplomatic” efforts to achieve peace that apparently the world isn’t really behind. The United Nations comes in, promises peace and then doesn’t meet the basic troop levels it commits to. The result is that Hezbollah wins.

There was much discussion about the Hezbollah declaration of victory against Israel. While on its face it appears absurd, on deeper inspection they are absolutely correct. Hezbollah did win.

If one’s definition of victory is simply hammering an adversary into submission, neither side could claim victory. If the definition is inflicting damage, surely Israel won. Hezbollah, using dumb-fire rockets, couldn’t manage to inflict any real discernible damage on Israel (well except they did hit a few cemeteries). However, if you define victory as achieving military objectives Israel certainly failed and Hezbollah certainly was victorious.

Israel’s objective was to crush Hezbollah or at least move them far enough north to be no real military threat. By any assessment, Israel inflicted little lasting damage on Hezbollah except to make them waste a bunch of rockets that Iran will replenish at their earliest convenience. Israel certainly did not respond in any meaningful way to the actual sources of Hezbollah aggression, namely Syria and Iran.

Hezbollah, on the other hand, didn’t appear to have any illusions of defeating Israel militarily. They seem to know full well that Israel will not be wiped off the map with tanks and bombs. They wage their war in the media and the chambers of the United Nations and yield the weapon of diplomacy with great success. Their objective was to not be defeated and gain political clout. They wanted to project an image that they could not be defeated militarily and need to be negotiated with. They achieved these objectives with resounding success.

Despite the media being fully aware and fully informed that most of the information coming from Hezbollah was doctored for effect, the media willingly complied. The embedded reporters with Hezbollah and produced puff piece after puff piece about Hezbollah social workers. One can whine about media bias all they want. When it comes to war, one needs to deal effectively with the tools of the enemy. Bitching never won a battle.

Hezbollah mounted an army of public relations specialists that were more powerful than any weapon in their arsenal. Put simply, they won the hearts and minds in Lebanon, in the Arab World, and much of the West (particular those left-leaning). Hezbollah’s clout increased dramatically as a result.

Now, theoretically, if the UN managed to deliver what is promised, if they could get 15,000 additional troops on the southern border with Lebanon, if they can deal with the Syrian border, if they can halt arms transfers from Iran, if they can effectively displace Hezbollah, then Israel and Lebanon will both be better off and democracy will thrive in Lebanon. If… if… if…

From the looks of the international community, it doesn’t appear likely that the UN will even be able to muster those troops needed which certainly calls into question whether they will succeed. Independent of troop levels, UNIFIL in Lebanon has never been successful and it is questionable that simply more warm bodies will do anything to help. As usual, the United Nations and the international community’s bloviation on peace never quite matches up to what they actually end up doing. In a perfect world the United Nations might be able to do something, however, in this world the United Nations is more talk and no walk. That’s when they aren’t being generally corrupt.

The result? If the UN fails, and it appears eminent that they will, Hezbollah will not only be more powerful on the foreign scene, they will be more powerful domestically. Lebanon recently threw off the shackles of Syrian oppression and was rightly high-lighted as a beacon of democratic hope in the Middle East.

Hezbollah is nothing more than Syrian power projection in Lebanon. If Lebanon could have dealt with them they would have long before rockets started falling on Israel. Increasing Hezbollah’s domestic power will result in the democratic advances made in Lebanon being turned back. In short, Lebanon will go the route of Palestine and put Hezbollah in power. Syria will be back in control of Lebanon and Lebanon will descend firmly into anti-Semitic fascism.

This descent was put into motion by Israel not fighting the war the way it should have been fought and it was solidified by the United Nations promising what it never could deliver. Israel had good cause to act militarily, however, by not engaging their enemy as they should have they leave Lebanon on the road to democratic collapse.

The following is the podcast of GM’s Corner that I co-hosted on Aug 17th, 2006.

August 30th, 2006 Posted by John Bambenek | Military / War, Politics, Wide Awakes Radio | one comment