Michelle Malkin brings you the parts of the investigation at Gitmo the MSM won’t report. That apparently of the 5 corroborated mishandling reports by guards of the Koran, there are 15 other reports of detainees themselves mishandling the Korans including the infamous Koran flushing incident (repeat: that was by a detainee not a guard).
In continuing the volume of agitprop in support of Al Qaeda, those details won’t make it out because that would undermine the ACLU and Amnesty International’s calls for a Special Prosecutor to ultimately impeach George Bush for thought crimes. Even John Kerry wants to reverse his startling loss by impeachment. Remember when the Left harps about “divisiveness” that they are the ones that brought it by supporting the enemies of our country and those who would kill our civilians.
Related Posts:
Taking Doug Patton to the WoodshedI Invoke Godwin’s LawFirst-Hand Testimony About the Conditions at GitmoKoranGate: What did they know and when did they know it?Polls Show When Bush Talks About his Plans, America Supports
June 4th, 2005
Posted by
John Bambenek |
Military / War |
8 comments
According to Drudge Report:
American Civil Liberties Union has been shredding documents over repeated objections of its records manager and in conflict with longstanding policies on preservation, disposal of records… Developing…
Lawyers have the strictest document retention policy around. They keep everything. Yet here we are with the ACLU destroying documents. Andersen did this to hide what they did with Enron and they were annihilated as a corporation (despite having their conviction ultimately overturned). What does the ACLU have to hide? This could be a bogus lead from Drudge, but if not it is explosive. Is the ACLU under criminal investigation and is worried that documents normally protected by attorney-client privilege would be taken? Do the documents show that the ACLU has been taking funds or shuffling funds to organizations it shouldn’t be?
There is no honest reason to be destroying documents for a law firm, something is amiss…
UPDATE: The New York Times is reporting on this. The ACLU records officer is not too pleased either.
Related Posts:
Smoke-Free CUWhat is Cooper Hiding?Stop The ACLU BlogburstDI Column Up: Welcoming in our New Health Conscious OverlordsStill Think the ACLU is All Goodness and Light, Glenn?
June 4th, 2005
Posted by
John Bambenek |
Law / Legal Issues |
4 comments
You’ve heard the charges. We’re desecrated the Koran at Gitmo (since retracted), we’ve institutionalized torture (because anything less than 3 squares and 8 hours of sleep and cable TV is torture), that we’re intentionally targeting journalists (I can sympathize with the military on this one, it is becoming harder to tell the difference between an insurgent and a reporter), and so on.
In accordance with “Bin Laden’s Terrorism Bible” (specifically Chapter 11 paragraph 1), Amnesty International has been a sounding board of false claims of torture. The Left celebrates IIMPR’s guest speaker Seymour Hersh who’s claim to fame was taking evidence in an ongoing criminal investigation that the military already released to the press (without pictures) on January 16th and publishing pictures of it thereby depriving the accused of any semblance of a fair trail and inflaming the Muslim world. They then continue to claim that torture was routine and that anything short of giving prisoners of war or enemy combatants anything less than 5 star accommodations is tantamount to torture.
The ACLU, far from being outdone, and continuing the word of Amnesty International insists that more pictures be released in flagrant violation of international law that apparently they are so worried about protecting in other circumstances which the ACLU itself admitted was ironic. Either you support international law or you don’t. Apparently they support international law when it works in their favor and when it doesn’t they throw it aside.
What happened at Abu Gharib was inexcusable, and that’s why those soldiers are being prosecuted. If it happened elsewhere, those soldiers should likewise be prosecuted. But when Seymour Hersh suggested that the White House didn’t want the pictures to get out because of the reaction of the Middle East, he suggested the answer as to why the President didn’t start firing everyone he could find. They knew the reaction and they were trying to do what was best for the country, what was best for the safety of soldiers, and to not give Al Qaeda more propaganda fodder. The ACLU and Amnesty International will have none of that; to them apparently Al Qaeda is the “good guy” in this fight.
What these organizations and the media as well as other organs of the Left have done is take the actions of a few and paint the entire military as a bunch of deviant sex offenders and torturers. The ACLU insists on making sure everyone in the world looks upon America as cruel destroyers of human life because they make prisoners stand too long. They insist the only human rights violators in the world anymore are the US and Israel were the likes of Syria, China, and Iran are free to jail and truly torture dissidents.
There was a time when the Left identified with oppressed people everywhere. With stories of innocents (not even political prisoners) had their bodies fed into tree chippers, the Left used to be the one protesting. Now apparently they’ve aligned themselves with those regimes which truly practice torture.
Related Posts:
Democrats Insist Only Republicans are to Blame for 9/11Detainees Beat Guards in Kick the Koran CompetitionStop The ACLU BlogburstFederal Court Rules Protecting America is UnconstitutionalAl Qaeda Attacks US Navy Ships in Jordan, Come Up Short
June 4th, 2005
Posted by
John Bambenek |
Military / War |
2 comments