There is one thing that has proven to work to stop AIDS, sexual fidelity. Condoms and sexual education programs have only INCREASED the AIDS infection rate in Africa. The UN knows this but still supports sex education, more abortion, and more condoms. Is it because they want to kill off Africans?
====
FRIDAY FAX
May 20, 2005
Volume 8, Number 22
UN AIDS Conference Threatens to Push for Increased Access to Abortion
On June 2, the UN will host a high-level conference to evaluate the
progress achieved in combating HIV/AIDS since 2001, when countries adopted
the Declaration of Commitment on HIV/AIDS. An emerging strategy by
abortion advocates has been to seek liberalization of abortion laws as
what they claim is a necessary step to HIV/AIDS prevention. The conference
threatens to result in further pressure on governments to forge linkages
between access to abortion and efforts to halt the spread of HIV.
A discussion paper for the conference advocates the “integration of
sexual and reproductive health and HIV/AIDS” and states that “sexual and
reproductive health services is a clear strategic entry point for
maximizing the impact of HIV prevention efforts.” The paper also ties
abortion rights to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), the UN’s major
current initiative, stating that “ensuring access to sexual and
reproductive health information and services…is essential for achieving
the Millennium Development Goals.”
“Reproductive health services” and similar expressions are understood
by the UN to include abortion. For example, the UN Millennium Project
study on ways to increase progress towards the MDGs states in a report,
under the subtitle “Full access to sexual and reproductive health
information and services…,” that ” A comprehensive district health
system…includes safe abortion services.”
The discussion paper for the June 2 conference cites the Millennium
Project study to recommend that “Governments incorporate universal access
to reproductive and sexual health services as an integral part of their
response to AIDS.”
The paper also cites as authoritative two recent manifestos produced by
the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) together with abortion activists and other
UN agencies. The Glion Call to Action urges countries to “strengthen
commitment to achieving universal access to reproductive health services,
including family planning, and recognize and support the contribution of
these services to HIV/AIDS prevention efforts.”
The New York Call to Commitment further calls for “strengthening of the
policy and programme linkages between HIV/AIDS and sexual and reproductive
health” and states that the MDGs “will not be achieved without ensuring
universal access to sexual and reproductive health services and
programmes.”
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, in his preparatory report for the June
2 conference, also approves of the New York Call to Commitment, saying
that it “articulates a comprehensive framework to maximize the use of
sexual and reproductive health services to strengthen the global AIDS
response.” Earlier, in a report for the Conference on Population and
Development, Annan had stated that “The United Nations and its partners
are expected to intensify programme linkages between HIV programmes and
sexual and reproductive health services.”
Copyright 2005 - C-FAM (Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute).
Permission granted for unlimited use. Credit required.
Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute
866 United Nations Plaza, Suite 427
New York, New York 10017
Phone: (212) 754-5948 Fax: (212) 754-9291
E-mail: c-fam@c-fam.org Website: www.c-fam.org
Related Posts:
Friday Fax / Let’s Keep Trying the Same Failed Strategies til We Get Different ResultsPlease Donate to the Tumaini FoundationThe End of an Era: I Have Left the Daily IlliniFriday Fax - Abortion Doesn’t Lower Maternal Mortality (Duh)The ACLU is Fighting for the Trafficking of Women Worldwide
May 19th, 2005
Posted by
John Bambenek |
Friday Fax / Culture & Cosmos |
no comments
The ACLU wants free and clear unregulated prostitution. There’s one minor problem. Aside of the high-end ones, most prostitutes are there because (1) they are beaten into submission to do it, or (2) are drug addicts, or (3) both. So instead of dealing with battered women or drug addictions they suggest that we just legalize the whole thing. Who cares if the woman is getting beaten by her pimp… two consenting adults right?
The blogburst is below.
====
The ACLU’s Policy 211 is straightforward.
“The ACLU supports the decriminalization of prostitution and opposes state regulation of prostitution”.
They
base their argument on several points, including that existing laws are
discriminating against women, and the right of individual privacy. They
argue that what two consenting adults in private do is their own business.
Prostitution is private? But isn’t the prostitute engaging in a business, isn’t she providing a service?
Would we not regulate and license a business? You wouldn’t want a
general contractor to work on your house without a license would you?
That would be unsafe as is an unregulated prostitute.
However,
the ACLU doesn’t believe in that philosophy. The question of privacy
comes in if the government is allowed to regulate the oldest profession.
The ACLU, in the name of “privacy rights,”
also opposes such things as curfew ordinances for juveniles (Policy
#206), sobriety road checks (#217), locker searches in high schools for
illegal drugs (#76), and searches of people boarding airplanes (#270).
The ACLU wants to remove all metal detectors in airports.
As
for it being a privacy issue, it seems a contradiction to me when they
also state that the “public” solicitation of prostitution is “entitled to the protection of the First Amendment”.
“It’s not just the bedroom that the ACLU wishes to make
off-limits to public censure, but also the local street corner,
presumably even if that corner is regularly used by school children
crossing the street.” source
Privacy
applies to two consenting adults when no contract is involved; a date
with no expectation of performance is a far cry from paying for a
service.
And what good would it do for women’s rights to
decriminalize this? One could argue that women should not be punished
for their own exploitation. But how does decriminalizing pimps, buyers,
procurers, brothels or other sex establishments offer any solution to
this? Decriminalization would do nothing but expand the sex industry
and send a message to society that it is acceptable. And a system
unregulated would do nothing for women’s health, and would only promote
the spread disease.
The more I learn about the ACLU, the more
I am convinced that they want to establish a new society based on
everything immoral. They are blinded by their elitist ideology to the
point they can’t even conceive of the possible consequences that will
result if they are enacted. The scary thing is that they hold so much
power, and lack so much responsibility. They must be stopped.
Sort of Cross posted at Stop the Aclu
This was a production of Stop The ACLU Blogburst! If you would like to join, it is very simple.
Go to our new portal at
Protest The ACLU
, click where it says “sign up now”, and fill out a simple form. This
will enable us to send you a weekly newsletter with information, and
keep your
email private. Current members who have not
registered, please do so. There are additonal advantages and features
that will be available for you there…you can opt to use them, or not.
Thank you!
Sites Already on Board:
Stop The ACLU
Freedom Of Thought
Mad Tech
Respublica
The Wide Awakes
Angry Republican Mom
Kender’s Musings
American Patriots
What Attitude Problem?
Life Trek
Gribbit’s Word
Def Conservative
An American Housewife
A Tic In The Mind’s Eye
Cao’s Blog
Regular Ron
Freedom Of
Is This Life?
Patriots For Bush
California Conservative 4 Truth
NIF
Obiter Dictum
PBS Watch
Xtreme Right Wing
Daily Inklings
Miss Patriot
Jack Lewis.net
Conservative Dialysis
Conservative Angst
Kill Righty
American Warmonger
Birth Of A Neo-Con
The Nose On Your Face
The View From Firehouse
Ogre’s View
Fundamentally right
Conservative Rant
My Political Soap Box
Common Sense Runs Wild
Redstate Rant
Time Hath Found Us
American Dinosaur
Merri Musings
And Rightly So
Sweet Spirits of Ammonia
Smithereen’s Files
Pulpit Pounder
Ravings of J.C.B.
Is It Just Me?
Blogtalker
Parrot Check
Stuff You Should Know
Rancher Blog
Christmas Ghost
Vista On Current Events
We
are trying to raise money for full page ads and eventually commercials
exposing the ACLU’s radical agenda. Help us out! Buy a bumper sticker,
a tshirt or a hoodie! I got my tshirts and wear them all the time to
shake up the libs!
Click Below To See Our Store!
Related Posts:
Stop The ACLU BlogburstThe ACLU is Fighting for the Trafficking of Women WorldwideStoptheACLU Blogburst: War against a discredited storyFederal Courts Require Funding of Supporters of Forced ProstitutionStop the ACLU: Stop the Pilfering of Tax Dollars
May 19th, 2005
Posted by
John Bambenek |
Law / Legal Issues |
2 comments
Cal Skinner sent me a link to this calculator that will show you based on where you live how much the average tax payer with an average home will pay in taxes compared to the old system. Here’s the catch… don’t own a home? You will pay 60-67% MORE in Illinois income tax. You do own a home? The offset in property tax relief will be less than the income tax relief except in very specific circumstances.
So here you have doublespeak at its finest where there is a 60-67% income tax hike, a 30% rate cut for ONE PART of property taxes, almost everyone pays more, and our Illinois politicians call it a TAX CUT. Hint… when you pay more, it’s not a tax cut.
On Business Law Matters
Having trouble with your taxes? You might want to find a business
lawyer who can help you deal with the legal side of such matters. There is a banking lawyer out there who deal specifically with legal matters like these so don’t delay, find some kind of commercial lawyer today.
Related Posts:
Illinois HB 750: The Amazing Tax IncreasePetition for John Paul the GreatMT 3.2 UpgradeGreat Post on NYT BiasSome more Weekend Reading
May 19th, 2005
Posted by
John Bambenek |
Illinois |
no comments
