Part-Time Pundit

Columns and Commentary by John Bambenek

Response to Candidate Questionnaire from Campaign for Comprehensive Sex Education / Planned Parenthood

The conventional political wisdom is not to respond to candidate questionnaires from “hostile” political organizations. It just doesn’t sit well with me not telling voters or political groups where I stand though. So this is what I sent Planned Parenthood in response to whether I would support a standardized comprehensive sex ed program for Unit 4.

The question of sexuality, particularly sex education, is invariably tied into a question of values and value systems. As such, any discussion immediately becomes polarized between right and left. The options are either abstinence-only or comprehensive-only sex education. This is a false dichotomy, but also makes a dangerous assumption about the role of schools and government.

The United States is a values-pluralistic society. With rare exceptions (e.g. crime) all values should be respected and the government should not try to mandate one set of values over another. Many players in this debate are encouraging exactly that: a mandating of a particular set of values.

It is my belief that parents present the value system of their choice to their children, and the schools and government should respect that. I do not support a standardized sexual health curriculum for Unit 4 because that would entail me making a decision on what values are important for someone else’s child, a decision I would not want imposed on myself as a parent.

I believe the policy of the Board should be to, as far as practical, handle the issue as the parents decide they want it handled. If they wish to have comprehensive sex education taught to their child, that is there choice and it should be available to them. If they wish only abstinence education be presented, that is likewise their choice. If they wish to handle the matter themselves in private with no interference from the schools, that should also be respected.

It is my firm and unwavering belief that the schools are not a tool to be used by government to prescribe value systems to our children aside of what is necessary to be a good citizen. The diversity of our nation and community requires that governmental leaders allow these value system choices be made by individuals and parents, not by elected officials.


Learn More Online

No matter what your views are on sex education everyone can agree that education is an important part of modern life. That’s why there’s a great online college out there for you. There are many benefits to doing your bachelors degree but the best part is the flexibility to do what you want! Find a great online university today!

Related Posts:

  • Hurricane Katrina: Planned Parenthood on the Scene Making Sure Black People Don’t Breed
  • BREAKING NEWS: Planned Parenthood Flouting Illinois Law for Fun and Profit
  • Number of Cases of Child Rape Covered Up by Planned Parenthood in Illinois Remains Steady in 2004
  • Planned Parenthood Says Prosecuting Child Rape Will Violate Privacy
  • No Restriction is Too Small – How the Supreme Court Enables Child Rapists
  • March 4th, 2007 Posted by John Bambenek | Chambana, Education, Elections, Politics, Unit 4 Race | one comment

    1 Comment »

    1. [...] Response to Candidate Questionnaire from Campaign for Comprehensive Sex Education / Planned Parentho…Column Up: “Leave it to Parents”Invasion of Privacy: State has no Business Mandating HPV Vaccine to School KidsWictory Wednesday Presents Tom Kean for US SenateNo Restriction is Too Small – How the Supreme Court Enables Child Rapists Leave a Reply [...]

      Pingback by Part-Time Pundit - Columns and Commentary » Ramming Values Down American Parents’ Throats - by John Bambenek | May 3, 2007

    Leave a comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment.